He wanted to tell the world he doesn’t believe in God, but the Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles wouldn’t let him.
Chris Bontrager tried to get a personalized Indiana license plate that read “ATHEIST,” but was shut down, and the Goshen man feels it’s unjust, according to the Elkhart Truth.
He submitted the personalized plate request in early January. The BMV sent him a letter rejecting the plate, but didn’t give a specific reason why, only citing that the BMV can deny a personalized plate based on three reasons:
• If it carry’s a connotation offensive to good taste or decency
• Would be misleading
• The BMV considers it improper for issuance
Their stance was affirmed in the U.S. Supreme court in a lawsuit filed in 2013 by an Indiana man who wanted “0INK” as his license plate. The vanity plate program was suspended until March of 2016 after the Supreme Court ruling.
Bontragor feels the rejection was religiously motivated. However, there’s no appeal process he can take with the Bureau of Motor Vehicles.
He’s discussing possible lawsuit options with the American Civil Liberties Union, who has told him he may have a case because of the state’s Establishment Clause. That clause states that, if the government allows one religious statement, it must allow all religions to have the same benefit.
6 comments
I believe he should be able to have his plate…I also think he is a dumb_ _ s but that is beside the point. What about the lie that church and state have to be separate. If you believe this lie then how can a government office decide this is not appropriate. If you (and the BMV) believe that separation of church and state is ridiculous then he should be denied.
Two callers said they see this license plate all the time near Notre Dame’s campus. It was likely denied because someone already has the plate.
Liberals are addicted to law suits. What an idiot.
Athiests seem to only be happy when they are offending someone. He’s a jerk.
That clause states that, if the government allows one religious statement, it must allow all religions to have the same benefit. Atheism is not a religion. If he wants to tell the world, let him get a bumper sticker.
It isn’t just freedom OF religion, it’s also freedom FROM religion.
Misleading to authorities? – NOPE
Improper? – NOPE. There’s nothing improper about expressing a belief or an absence of belief. They’re equal.
Offensive – NOPE. No more than expressing a belief in one religion is offensive to all other religions.